Bad News Books
“Making predictions is
hard, especially about the future” – attributed in various forms to Yogi Berra,
Niels Bohr, a folk proverb, and other sources
Some doom and gloom books can be interesting and informative
– the sort that draw their conclusions from situations and trends in the real
world, as distinct from those that rely
on mystical prophecy, secret knowledge
from space aliens or the pyramids, astrology, numerology, or whatever other nonsense an author might
think of. In the last few days, perhaps
inspired by the things going on in the last month or so, I reread a few from years ago.
The late 1970s were a good time for books in the genre, and
it is easy to see why. The economy was in
an inflationary depression. Some cities
seemed to be becoming unlivable. The
Soviets were winning the cold war. Terrorists were hijacking airplanes,
murdering people, and even killing athletes at the olympics. The Vietnam war and its peace settlement had
been a total failure. The last three elected presidents were name
Johnson, Nixon, and Carter. It was a
mess.
A man named John Pugsley wrote a very popular book called
The Alpha Strategy. In it he observed correctly that the dollar had lost much
of its purchasing power since World War II, that government actions cause monetary
inflation, that stocks and bonds had
performed badly since the late 1960s, that taxation and regulation were harming the economy and making people’s
lives worse, and that the country was in bad shape. His solution was for people
to abandon investing in stocks and bonds and put their money into stockpiles of
goods - razor blades, wine, linens, hand
tools, food, all sorts of things that would store well – they could consume in
the future and not have to buy at inflated prices with depreciated dollars and
also into stockpiles of raw commodities held for purposes of investment. He concluded “the next decade promises to be
the most turbulent decade in this century. The plunder is mounting. The die is
case. The economic storms are unavoidable, and the outcome for most individuals
will be the destruction of their wealth.”
Mel Tappan, who was probably the most famous of the
survivalist authors, went farther than writers
such as Pugsley. He correctly saw
increased crime and terrorism, serious
inflation, the decline of the cities, the failures of government
schools, the threat of nuclear war, the cold war going against the United
States, risks of breakdowns of social order, the threat of a grasping and over
reaching government , the decline of respect for citizens’ rights, and the
general malaise in society. He decided it was too late to save the country,
and that it was time literally to head for the hills. (The main text of his book Tappan
on Survival begins with Yeats’s famous blood-dimmed tide passage.) His solution was to move to a small town far
away from any big city, military base, or nuclear power plant, purchase a plot
of land nearby, become a self-sufficient
farmer/rancher, arm oneself appropriately,
and hope that one could avoid or together with one’s neighbors could fend
off the gangs of looters (governmental
or freelance) that would pour out of the
cities when society collapsed. His book
is full of practical advice on the skills, tools, and attitudes one would need to make
the move successfully.
Pugsley, Tappan, and others writing at the time were
completely wrong about what was to come. The next decade, the 1980s, was one of
remarkable peace, prosperity, and security.
The United States won the cold war. Inflation was brought under control.
The economy was strong and growing. Stocks and bonds did well over the decade,
while gold and silver did poorly. There
was no need to head for the hills.
There were still people at the end of the 1980s who were afraid
big trouble was coming despite the end of the cold war and the general
prosperity. James Dale Davidson and
William Rees-Mogg correctly saw the rise
of radical Islam as a geopolitical force,
the economic power and growth of Japan, problems of crime and unrest in big cities, the looming danger
from politically correct
multiculturalism, and other problems in
the world. In their 1991 book the Great Reckoning they predicted that that the
United States would suffer a great depression in the 1990s and be replaced by
Japan as the world’s leading economic power. They were spectacularly wrong. The
1990s were a second decade of peace, prosperity, and security with
technological innovations driving a vigorous American economy. Japan endured a lost
decade of economic stagnation.
These authors and various others who wrote in the genre were
not fools. Many of the things they saw as dangers were (and still are) real,
and some of the things they predicted could have happened. They were just wrong in allowing their disgust
and pessimism over some things in the
country to cause them to miss or ignore things which could have led to better
outcomes than those they predicted over confidently. I wonder if the danger for
us now is not the reverse. The two decades since Y2K have not been a match for
the 80s or 90s, but for those of us who avoided fighting in futile wars in Iraq or Afghanistan, didn’t lose our shirts in one of the three big financial panics, and
didn’t have our jobs or businesses outsourced overseas, things have been pretty
good. Technological advances have
continued. There is no serious foreign
military threat, though the Chinese are working on it. The country has been generally prosperous. We may be too complacent. Forty years are a
long time. Reading these books or some
like them might help correct that. There
are things to worry about, and, after all, Yogi or whoever really said it was right.
Labels: books, politics, survivalism
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home