Bad Behavior and Explanations
The news lately has been full of stories of famous or at least well known men
having behaved badly sexually toward women (and sometimes boys or other men) by actions including vulgar and unwanted
solicitations, insulting inducement, harassment, intimidation, bullying, or
even assault or rape.
Some religious and social conservatives have blamed this on
people’s abandoning traditional notions of proper sexual behavior - such as the disapproval of sexual activity
before or outside of marriage, the condemnation of homosexuality as sinful, the
particular importance of female virginity at the time of marriage, and the
general view of sexual interest and behavior as part of humanity’s lower nature - starting with the so-called sexual revolution
of the 1960s and getting worse ever since.
To them there is a natural progression from more liberal attitudes on sexuality to
Weinstein, Spacey, and Lauer. Yet there is
no necessary or observable connection. It
is quite possible to think that people do not need the approval of the
government or a church for their sexual activities, that homosexuals are not
sinners, that virginity up to marriage
is not important, and that sex is a fine thing and still disapprove of and refrain
from coercing or harassing anyone
sexually. Many people do so, while many
people with strict traditional beliefs are guilty of these things. The argument seems to say more about a
historical thread of hostility to sexuality in Christianity than about anything
really occurring. It calls to mind both Mencken’s definition of a puritan and
the old quote about a person having been taught that sex is the most bestial and degrading of
human activities, and one must save it for one the person he loves most in the
world.
Some leftist feminists have put the blame on masculinity –
not some men’s hubris, indecency, or
lack of honor, but on masculinity itself. This makes even less sense than what
the social conservatives are saying. There are plenty of strong, masculine men who restrict their romantic attentions and
activities to women who are receptive to them, do not assume all women fall into
that category, and behave as gentlemen. There are plenty of
wimps who are harassers or worse. (It is
fair to note that it is likely neither Al Franken nor Kevin Spacey nor Matt Lauer, to cite some prominent examples,
would be seen by most people as an exemplar of masculinity.) This argument seems to say more about a thread
of neurotic man hating in leftist feminism than about anything really
occurring. It also serves to support the
viewpoint of some rude stereotypes and crude jokes about leftist feminists.
There are, however, some simple and obvious observations to help
explain what has gone on. Successful phonies are good at fooling people
and often can do so for a long time. Unethical people will tend to do what they
think they can get away with. When they get
some power and authority, they will tend
to think they can get away with a good deal. Fame does not make trash any less trashy or scum
any less scummy. People sometimes
tolerate more than they should from people they fear or think can be of benefit
to them. That covers a lot of it.
Labels: feminism, harassment, politics, social conservatives
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home