A Few Hints on Privacy
It is commonplace that in the last decade or so privacy has
gotten harder to obtain or preserve for most of us. There are many well known reasons
for this. The apparent increase in surveillance
and spying on ordinary Americans by the government since 2001 is the most
obvious one, but we also have hacking against and theft from networks and
databases of all sorts, the tracking and monitoring of people’s activity and
even physical movements by providers of network and mobile phone services, the
widespread use of surveillance cameras by both governments and private
organizations, the general lessening of respect for civil rights in the name of
homeland security, and various other factors.
I think this trend is already dangerous and has the
potential to become far more so. I also think people who care about their
rights and liberty should do what they can to resist it and protect themselves ,
both for their own good and the good of the country.
I can think of a few obvious things to do. While there may
be safe and secure networks and devices connected to them (though on the
evidence that is not the way to bet), a person has no way of knowing if the venders
and services he is using provide them. So he should keep and view the detailed
spreadsheet of his assets and
investments, the indiscrete photos and videos of him and his spouse, the inventory
of his firearms and ammunition, the compendia
of rude jokes about members of currently favored racial or other groups, his written
musings on his unpleasant in-laws or worthless son-in-law, journals detailing
his private, unpopular political activities and beliefs, notes on the abilities and character of his
co-workers and bosses, and other things he does not want to share with either
the general public or nosey civil servants on devices which are never connected
to any network. This obviously precludes
backing up sensitive data with any of the commercial external backup services. A
person has no way of knowing how secure a company’s servers and encryption are or what potential snoopers
have what sort of access through mandated back doors.
People who watch detective shows or the local news know telecom companies keep
records of phone calls, and government agencies can get them. At least some bureaucrats also seem to be empowered to listen in on the
content of phone calls with far less
oversight or requirement to show cause
than people once thought. Records
of emails and other activity on the internet seem to be even less protected and
more open to government snooping than phone calls. They are also
vulnerable to hackers. So people should
be cautious about what they say and what they type, and all the more so on
office computers and other devices they do not control. In particular so-called
social media sites are actual or potential wide open windows for Peeping Toms from
coast to coast and should be used carefully if at all.
Since records of transactions using credit or debit cards
are apparently secure from neither officials
nor hackers, I would suggest the radical
step of going back to old, anonymous cash for as many of a person’s
transactions as can be done conveniently.
Using cash has other benefits too. A person can’t spend more of it than
he has for one thing. Some things such as ammunition and really
unpopular anti-government publications probably should be bought only with
cash, irrespective of any inconvenience.
I also think people should join the political struggle to regain citizens’ lost
privacy, forming coalitions with people who share that goal, irrespective of
their other political opinions. However
benign one may think our present officials are, there is always the chance the
next bunch or the one after that may have other ideas and goals.
Labels: civil rights, individual rights, politics, privacy