A Simple Reform
Most people agree that there is a great deal wrong with the
way people purchase and pay for health care in the United States. There is one thing in particular that strikes
me as grossly unfair and even idiotic that is rarely mentioned. I will
illustrate with an actual example from a real patient – me. In conjunction with my annual physical, I had
blood drawn and a number of laboratory tests performed. The amount billed for the tests by the lab
was four hundred fifteen dollars and
change. My health insurance is
administered by Blue Cross of Texas. Blue Cross calculated the tests were worth
forty four dollars and eighty two cents. The laboratory company accepted this
as always. My insurance paid a shade under thirty six of it, and I was on the
hook for eight dollars and ninety five cents.
There are several points to make here. The first is that the
lab did not lose money on the forty four eighty two. The second is that my real
savings were not so much in what my
insurance paid as in the rate structure it had obtained from laboratories. The third is that there are poor suckers
out there without insurance who get real bills, not phony ones as I did, for the whole
four hundred and fifteen. This strikes me as wrong. I understand that large groups have
purchasing power and that the rate charged
a single person might well be somewhat larger than that charged a member
of a large purchasing group. I do not understand a factor of almost ten.
This is not a particularly unusual example as people can tell
by looking at their own statements. In office procedures and other things often
show similar differences. Cheap catastrophic insurance with high deductibles could
solve many of the problems of the many
of the uninsured, but not this one. It
is not that the labs or any other providers of services are necessarily villains
in this. There may be rules or perverse
incentives that have led to these practices. However things needs to be fixed,
and fixing them does not seem that difficult. There should be a way for people with no or
only catastrophic insurance to participate in some sort of group that
negotiates cheaper rates for them just as Blue Cross does for those it
represents. That would be a reform worth considering after Obamacare is gone.
Labels: Health care, insurance, politics